Three Problems with Metaethical Minimalism

Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (1):125-131 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Metaethical minimalism. sometimes called quietism, is the view that first-order moral judgments can be true but nothing makes them true. This article raises three worries for that view. First, minimalists have no good reason to insist that moral judgments can be true. Second, minimalism, in abandoning the requirement that true judgments need to have truthmakers, leads to a problematic proliferation of truths. Third, most versions of minimalism entail a disjointed and therefore unacceptable theory of language and thought.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Whose Metaethical Minimalism?Noell Birondo - 2018 - Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (2):37-43.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #29,101 of 41,600 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,176 of 41,600 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.