Does Epistemic Humility Threaten Religious Beliefs?

Journal of Psychology and Theology 46 (4):292– 304 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a fallen world fraught with evidence against religious beliefs, it is tempting to think that, on the assumption that those beliefs are true, the best way to protect them is to hold them dogmatically. Dogmatic belief, which is highly confident and resistant to counterevidence, may fail to exhibit epistemic virtues such as humility and may instead manifest epistemic vices such as arrogance or servility, but if this is the price of secure belief in religious truths, so be it. I argue, however, that even in a world full of misleading evidence against true religious beliefs, cultivating epistemic humility is the better way to achieve believers’ epistemic aims. The reason is that dogmatic belief courts certain epistemic dangers, including to the true religious beliefs themselves, whereas epistemic humility empowers believers to counter them.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DORDEH
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-12-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-03

Total views
527 ( #12,464 of 65,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #7,017 of 65,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.