Non‐Inferentialism about Justification – The Case of Aesthetic Judgements

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):660-682 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article, I present two objections against the view that aesthetic judgements – that is, judgemental ascriptions of aesthetic qualities like elegance or harmony – are justified non‐inferentially. The first is that this view cannot make sense of our practice to support our aesthetic judgements by reference to lower‐level features of the objects concerned. The second objection maintains that non‐inferentialism about the justification of aesthetic judgements cannot explain why our aesthetic interest in artworks and other objects is limited to only some of their lower‐level features that realise their higher‐level aesthetic qualities. Although my concern with the view that aesthetic judgements are subject to non‐inferential justification is very general, my discussion is primarily structured around Sibley's well‐developed and influential version of this view.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DORNAJ
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-06-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-14

Total views
328 ( #8,304 of 38,963 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #9,776 of 38,963 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.