Against Philosophical Proofs Against Common Sense

Analysis (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers think that common sense knowledge survives sophisticated philosophical proofs against it. Recently, however, Bryan Frances (forthcoming) has advanced a philosophical proof that he thinks common sense can’t survive. Exploiting philosophical paradoxes like the Sorites, Frances attempts to show how common sense leads to paradox and therefore that common sense methodology is unstable. In this paper, we show how Frances’s proof fails and then issue Frances a dilemma.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUAPP-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-10-16
Latest version: 3 (2020-10-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-10-16

Total views
273 ( #17,953 of 53,636 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
273 ( #1,305 of 53,636 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.