From probabilities to categorical beliefs: Going beyond toy models

Journal of Logic and Computation 28 (6):1099-1124 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the Lockean thesis, a proposition is believed just in case it is highly probable. While this thesis enjoys strong intuitive support, it is known to conflict with seemingly plausible logical constraints on our beliefs. One way out of this conflict is to make probability 1 a requirement for belief, but most have rejected this option for entailing what they see as an untenable skepticism. Recently, two new solutions to the conflict have been proposed that are alleged to be non-skeptical. We compare these proposals with each other and with the Lockean thesis, in particular with regard to the question of how much we gain by adopting any one of them instead of the probability 1 requirement, that is, of how likely it is that one believes more than the things one is fully certain of.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUGBT
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Full & Partial Belief.Genin, Konstantin

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-07-17

Total views
61 ( #32,783 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #25,654 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.