Natural Theology, Evidence, and Epistemic Humility

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One not infrequently hears rumors that the robust practice of natural theology reeks of epistemic pride. Paul Moser’s is a paradigm of such contempt. In this paper we defend the robust practice of natural theology from the charge of epistemic pride. In taking an essentially Thomistic approach, we argue that the evidence of natural theology should be understood as a species of God’s general self-revelation. Thus, an honest assessment of that evidence need not be prideful, but can be an act of epistemic humility, receiving what God has offered, answering God’s call. Lastly, we provide criticisms of Moser’s alternative approach, advancing a variety of philosophical and theological problems against his conception of personifying evidence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUNTE
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-06-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology.Conee, Earl & Feldman, Richard
The Problem of Evil.van Inwagen, Peter
Religious Epistemology.Tweedt, Chris & Dougherty, Trent

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-06-19

Total views
247 ( #15,818 of 45,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #18,900 of 45,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.