Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (23):1109-1121 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A great deal of research has focused on the question of whether or not concepts are embodied as a rule. Supporters of embodiment have pointed to studies that implicate affective and sensorimotor systems in cognitive tasks, while critics of embodiment have offered nonembodied explanations of these results and pointed to studies that implicate amodal systems. Abstract concepts have tended to be viewed as an important test case in this polemical debate. This essay argues that we need to move beyond a pretheoretical notion of abstraction. Against the background of current research and theory, abstract concepts do not pose a single, unified problem for embodied cognition but, instead, three distinct problems: the problem of generalization, the problem of flexibility, and the problem of disembodiment. Identifying these problems provides a conceptual framework for critically evaluating, and perhaps improving upon, recent theoretical proposals.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOVTSU
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-11

Total downloads
8 ( #31,965 of 32,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #27,805 of 32,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.