A Defense Against Attacks on Negative Liberty

Journal of Libertarian Studies 24 (2):317-322 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Isaiah Berlin made the distinction between negative liberty and positive liberty. Since then, prominent contemporary philosophers including Charles Taylor and Martha Nussbaum have declared negative liberty insufficient or incoherent. This is a critique of those declarations, which have been unduly accepted to a large extent. The critique primarily focuses on Taylor, who made the most direct and complete argument against negative liberty. His argument is shown to be ineffective. And further, his conception of positive liberty is shown to be incoherent.

Author's Profile

Stuart T Doyle
University of Kansas

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-11

Downloads
1,680 (#7,918)

6 months
348 (#4,164)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?