Nonbelief vs. Lack of Evidence

Philo 1 (1):105-114 (1998)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
After a presentation of the problem of God's hiddenness, there is discussion of two arguments for God's nonexistence related to that problem. One is the Lack-of-evidence Argument (LEA), according to which there would have been good objective evidence of God's existence if he were to exist. The other is the Argument from Nonbelief (ANB), according to which there would not be as many nonbelievers as there actually are if God were to exist. Reasons are given for assessing ANB as a stronger argument than LEA.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Scepticism About the Argument From Divine Hiddenness.Mcbrayer, Justin P. & Swenson, Philip

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
189 ( #18,484 of 43,916 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #20,683 of 43,916 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.