Nonbelief vs. Lack of Evidence

Philo 1 (1):105-114 (1998)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
After a presentation of the problem of God's hiddenness, there is discussion of two arguments for God's nonexistence related to that problem. One is the Lack-of-evidence Argument (LEA), according to which there would have been good objective evidence of God's existence if he were to exist. The other is the Argument from Nonbelief (ANB), according to which there would not be as many nonbelievers as there actually are if God were to exist. Reasons are given for assessing ANB as a stronger argument than LEA.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-26
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
243 ( #19,980 of 53,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #21,003 of 53,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.