Materialism and the Activity of Matter in Seventeenth‐Century European Philosophy

Philosophy Compass 11 (11):671-680 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Early modern debates about the nature of matter interacted with debates about whether matter could think. In particular, some philosophers (e.g., Cudworth and Leibniz) objected to materialism about the human mind on the grounds that matter is passive, thinking things are active, and one cannot make an active thing out of passive material. This paper begins by looking at two seventeenth-century materialist views (Hobbes’s, and one suggested but not endorsed by Locke) before considering that objection (which I call here the Activity Argument). In discussion, I note that several philosophers of the time believed that matter was active. That view opens up a possible response to the Activity Argument. The paper concludes by looking at the views of two materialists of the time who also believed that matter was active, Toland and Cavendish.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DUNMAT-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-02-28
Latest version: 2 (2016-05-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-28

Total views
417 ( #9,100 of 46,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #6,146 of 46,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.