We are acquainted with ourselves

Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2531-2549 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I am aware of the rain outside, but only in virtue of looking at a weather report. I am aware of my friend, but only because I hear her voice through my phone. Thus, there are some things that I’m aware of, but only indirectly. Many philosophers believe that there are also some things of which I am directly aware. The most plausible candidates are experiences such as pains, tickles, visual sensations, etc. In fact, the philosophical consensus seems to be that experiences are the only plausible candidates for acquaintance. But I will argue that we are also acquainted with ourselves. After outlining what it means to be acquainted with oneself, I will introduce, develop, and defend a commonly used test for acquaintance. Then I will apply this test to us and show that we pass. I will consider various objections to my argument. But ultimately I will conclude that we can be, and often are, acquainted with ourselves
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DUNWAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-12-21

Total views
154 ( #42,544 of 71,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #27,878 of 71,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.