What Is a Perfect Syllogism in Aristotelian Syllogistic?

Ancient Philosophy 35 (2):351-374 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The question as to what makes a perfect Aristotelian syllogism a perfect one has long been discussed by Aristotelian scholars. G. Patzig was the first to point the way to a correct answer: it is the evidence of the logical necessity that is the special feature of perfect syllogisms. Patzig moreover claimed that the evidence of a perfect syllogism can be seen for Barbara in the transitivity of the a-relation. However, this explanation would give Barbara a different status over the other three first figure syllogisms. I argue that, taking into account the role of the being-contained-as-in-a-whole formulation, transitivity can be seen to be present in all four first figure syllogisms. Using this wording will put the negation sign with the predicate, similar to the notation in modern predicate calculus.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth, Etc.Barnes, Jonathan

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
849 ( #3,832 of 50,531 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
165 ( #2,572 of 50,531 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.