What Is a Perfect Syllogism in Aristotelian Syllogistic?

Ancient Philosophy 35 (2):351-374 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The question as to what makes a perfect Aristotelian syllogism a perfect one has long been discussed by Aristotelian scholars. G. Patzig was the first to point the way to a correct answer: it is the evidence of the logical necessity that is the special feature of perfect syllogisms. Patzig moreover claimed that the evidence of a perfect syllogism can be seen for Barbara in the transitivity of the a-relation. However, this explanation would give Barbara a different status over the other three first figure syllogisms. I argue that, taking into account the role of the being-contained-as-in-a-whole formulation, transitivity can be seen to be present in all four first figure syllogisms. Using this wording will put the negation sign with the predicate, similar to the notation in modern predicate calculus.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EBEWIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-12-10

Total views
519 ( #4,938 of 40,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
144 ( #2,650 of 40,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.