Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Conditionality Problem for Externalism

Episteme:1-21 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Epistemological disjunctivism (ED) has been thought to solve the conditionality problem for epistemic externalism. This problem arises from externalists’ characterization of our epistemic standings as conditional on the obtaining of worldly facts which we lack any reflective access to. ED is meant to avoid the conditionality problem by explicating subjects’ perceptual knowledge in paradigmatic cases of perceptual knowledge via their possession of perceptual reasons that are both factive and reflectively accessible. I argue that ED’s account of reflectively accessible factive perceptual reasons is also prey to the conditionality problem. After that, I submit that Stroud’s influential formulation of the conditionality problem relies on a methodological requirement that is potentially dissociable from ED. So, it is possible to put ED in the service of a more modest anti-skeptical strategy. I close by suggesting that this modest anti-skeptical strategy successfully undercuts the underdetermination-based skeptical paradox. Nevertheless, it does not have substantial advantages over some forms of epistemic externalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ECHEDA
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-01-05
Latest version: 2 (2022-01-12)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-01-05

Total views
68 ( #60,745 of 72,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #30,080 of 72,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.