An inconsistency in the (supposed) prohibitions of philosophy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In different papers, David Liggins and Chris Daly tell philosophers what they should not do. There is no sign of them withdrawing any of these prohibitions, but I show that they fail to be consistent when asserting them. The inconsistency concerns when a philosopher should defer to the empirical findings of science.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-10-01
Latest version: 12 (2020-10-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
176 ( #25,703 of 53,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #40,749 of 53,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.