An inconsistency in the (supposed) prohibitions of philosophy

Abstract

In different papers, David Liggins and Chris Daly tell philosophers what they should not do. There is no sign of them withdrawing any of these prohibitions, but I show that they fail to be consistent when asserting them. The inconsistency concerns when a philosopher should defer to the empirical findings of science.

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-01

Downloads
481 (#49,573)

6 months
107 (#48,570)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?