God as a Single Processing Actual Entity

Process Studies 42 (1):77-86 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article defends Marjorie Suchocki’s position against two main objections raised by David E. Conner. Conner objects that God as a single actual entity must be temporal because there is succession in God’s experience ofthe world. The reply is that time involves at least two successive occasions separated by perishing, but in God nothing ever perishes. Conner also objects that Suchocki’s personalistic process theism is not experiential but is instead theoretical and not definitive. The reply is that his dismissal of Part V of PR is arbitrary, the interpretation of all experience is theoretical, and no metaphysical interpretations are absolutely definitive, including PR as a whole. Also, Conner ignores religious experience.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
0360-6503
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EDWGAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-04-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
138 ( #28,545 of 51,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #38,487 of 51,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.