Mental health as rational autonomy

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (3):309-322 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rather than eliminate the terms "mental health and illness" because of the grave moral consequences of psychiatric labeling, conservative definitions are proposed and defended. Mental health is rational autonomy, and mental illness is the sustained loss of such. Key terms are explained, advantages are explored, and alternative concepts are criticized. The value and descriptive components of all such definitions are consciously acknowledged. Where rational autonomy is intact, mental hospitals and psychotherapists should not think of themselves as treating an illness. Instead, they are functioning as applied axiologists, moral educators, spiritual mentors, etc. They deal with what Szasz has called "personal, social, and ethical problems in living." But mental illness is real.

Author's Profile

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-14

Downloads
658 (#33,958)

6 months
170 (#18,654)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?