The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine the impact of the presence of anarchists among key legal officials upon the legal positivist theories of H.L.A. Hart and Joseph Raz. For purposes of this paper, an anarchist is one who believes that the law cannot successfully obligate or create reasons for action beyond prudential reasons, such as avoiding sanction. I show that both versions of positivism require key legal officials to endorse the law in some way, and that if a legal system can continue to exist and function when its key officials reject the reason-giving character of law, then we have a reason to re-examine and amend legal positivism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EHRTAO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-09-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-06-20

Total views
881 ( #4,979 of 2,427,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,645 of 2,427,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.