Comparativism and the Measurement of Partial Belief

Erkenntnis 87 (6):2843-2870 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to comparativism, degrees of belief are reducible to a system of purely ordinal comparisons of relative confidence. (For example, being more confident that P than that Q, or being equally confident that P and that Q.) In this paper, I raise several general challenges for comparativism, relating to (i) its capacity to illuminate apparently meaningful claims regarding intervals and ratios of strengths of belief, (ii) its capacity to draw enough intuitively meaningful and theoretically relevant distinctions between doxastic states, and (iii) its capacity to handle common instances of irrationality.

Author's Profile

Edward J. R. Elliott
University of Leeds

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-16

Downloads
429 (#33,981)

6 months
122 (#23,769)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?