Why Delayed Choice Experiments do NOT imply Retrocausality

Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 2 (2):183-199 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a fallacy that is often involved in the interpretation of quantum experiments involving a certain type of separation such as the: double-slit experiments, which-way interferometer experiments, polarization analyzer experiments, Stern-Gerlach experiments, and quantum eraser experiments. The fallacy leads not only to flawed textbook accounts of these experiments but to flawed inferences about retrocausality in the context of delayed choice versions of separation experiments.

Author's Profile

David Ellerman
University of Ljubljana

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-16

Downloads
729 (#10,653)

6 months
42 (#30,935)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?