In for a Penny, or: If you Disapprove of Investment Migration, Why Do You Approve of High-Skilled Migration?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
While many argue investment-based criteria for immigration are wrong or at least problematic, skill-based criteria remain relatively uncontroversial. This is normatively inconsistent. This article assesses three prominent normative objections to investment-based selection criteria for immigrants: (i) that they wrongfully discriminate between prospective immigrants (ii) that they are unfair, and (iii) that they undermine political equality among citizens. It argues that either skill-based criteria are equally susceptible to these objections, or that investment-based criteria are equally shielded from them. Indeed, in some ways investment-based criteria are less normatively problematic than skill-based criteria. Given this analysis, the resistance to investment-based migration criteria, but not to skill-based criteria, is inconsistent.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EREIFA
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-10-10

Total views
72 ( #35,874 of 47,265 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
72 ( #9,472 of 47,265 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.