Infinite Judgements and Transcendental Logic

Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 20 (2):391-415 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The infinite judgement has long been forgotten and yet, as I am about to demonstrate, it may be urgent to revive it for its critical and productive potential. An infinite judgement is neither analytic nor synthetic; it does not produce logical truths, nor true representations, but it establishes the genetic conditions of real objects and the concepts appropriate to them. It is through infinite judgements that we reach the principle of transcendental logic, in the depths of which all reality can emerge in its material and sensible singularity, making possible all generalization and formal abstraction

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-15

Downloads
537 (#28,403)

6 months
214 (#10,496)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?