Posthuman Rights: Dimensions of Transhuman Worlds

Teknokultura 12 (2):373-384 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are at least three dimensions to rights. We may have and lack freedom to 1) be, 2) do, and 3) have. These dimensions reformulate Locke’s categories, and are further complicated by placing them within the context of domains such as natural or civil rights. Here the question of the origins of rights is not addressed, but issues concerning how we may contextualize them are discussed. Within the framework developed, this paper makes use of Actor-Network Theory and Enlightenment values to examine the multidimensionality and appropriateness of animal rights and human rights for posthumans. The core position here is that rights may be universal and constant, but they can only be accessed within a matrix of relative cultural dimensions. This will be true for posthumans, and their rights will be relative to human rights and dependent on human and posthuman responsibilities.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
When Species Meet.Haraway, Donna J.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
179 ( #17,483 of 41,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #34,431 of 41,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.