Group Testimony: Defending a Reductionist View

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Our aim in this paper is to defend the reductionist (or deflationist) view on group testimony from the attacks of divergence arguments. We will begin by presenting how divergence arguments can challenge the reductionist view. However, we will argue that these arguments are not decisive to rule out the reductionist view; for, these arguments have false premises, assuming dubious epistemic principles that testimony cannot generate knowledge and understanding. The final part of this paper will be devoted to presenting the advantages of the reductionist approach to explaining the phenomenon of group testimony.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FARGTD-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-09-22

Total views
67 ( #51,126 of 2,448,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #33,846 of 2,448,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.