Why Replication is Overrated

Philosophy of Science 86 (5):895-905 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Current debates about the replication crisis in psychology take it for granted that direct replication is valuable and focus their attention on questionable research practices in regard to statistical analyses. This paper takes a broader look at the notion of replication as such. It is argued that all experimentation/replication involves individuation judgments and that research in experimental psychology frequently turns on probing the adequacy of such judgments. In this vein, I highlight the ubiquity of conceptual and material questions in research, and I argue that replication is not as central to psychological research as it is sometimes taken to be.

Author's Profile

Uljana Feest
Universit├Ąt Hannover


Added to PP

1,368 (#7,402)

6 months
270 (#7,388)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?