Content, the Possible and the Impossible

Analysis 77 (3):648-658 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What are contents? The answer provided by the possible worlds approach is that contents are sets of possible worlds. This approach incurs serious problems and to solve them Jago suggests, in The Impossible, to get rid of the ‘possible’ bit and allowing some impossible worlds to be part of the game. In this note, I briefly consider the metaphysics behind Jago’s account and then focus on whether Jago is right in thinking that his worlds and his worlds only can do the explanatory work he posits them for.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
74 ( #22,318 of 34,905 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #21,639 of 34,905 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.