Lost in Translation?

Topoi 38 (2):265-276 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to neo-Russellianism, in a sentence such as John believes that Mont Blanc is 4000 m high, any other proper name co-referring with Mont Blanc can be substituted for it without any change in the proposition expressed. Prima facie, our practice of translation shows that this cannot be correct. We will then show that neo-Russellians have a way out of this problem, which consists in holding that actual translations are not a matter of semantics, but also make an attempt at preserving some pragmatic features of the sentences to be translated. We then turn to translations that only preserve the semantic characteristics of the sentences and we argue that, although these translations are unable to show that neo-Russellianism is incorrect, they still show that it relies on some theses that seem to have no justification, apart from saving neo-Russellianism itself.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-13
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
201 ( #34,536 of 69,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #56,100 of 69,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.