On the Proper Domain of Psychological Predicates

Synthese 194 (11):4289-4310 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


One question of the bounds of cognition is that of which things have it. A scientifically relevant debate on this question must explain the persistent and selective use of psychological predicates to report findings throughout biology: for example, that neurons prefer, fruit flies and plants decide, and bacteria communicate linguistically. This paper argues that these claims should enjoy default literal interpretation. An epistemic consequence is that these findings can contribute directly to understanding the nature of psychological capacities.

Author's Profile

Carrie Figdor
University of Iowa


Added to PP

926 (#9,692)

6 months
67 (#26,957)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?