On the Proper Domain of Psychological Predicates

Synthese 194 (11):4289-4310 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One question of the bounds of cognition is that of which things have it. A scientifically relevant debate on this question must explain the persistent and selective use of psychological predicates to report findings throughout biology: for example, that neurons prefer, fruit flies and plants decide, and bacteria communicate linguistically. This paper argues that these claims should enjoy default literal interpretation. An epistemic consequence is that these findings can contribute directly to understanding the nature of psychological capacities.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Thinking Without Words.Bermúdez, José Luis
Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience.Bennett, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S.
Thought and Talk.Davidson, Donald

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
543 ( #6,684 of 47,300 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
96 ( #6,244 of 47,300 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.