What is the “Cognitive” in Cognitive Neuroscience?

Neuroethics 6 (1):105-114 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that the cognitive neuroscientific use of ordinary mental terms to report research results and draw implications can contribute to public confusion and misunderstanding regarding neuroscience results. This concern is raised at a time when cognitive neuroscientists are increasingly required by funding agencies to link their research to specific results of public benefit, and when neuroethicists have called for greater attention to public communication of neuroscience. The paper identifies an ethical dimension to the problem and presses for greater sensitivity and responsibility among neuroscientists regarding their use of such terms.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FIGWIT
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-10-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-04-14

Total views
406 ( #14,027 of 2,426,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #44,355 of 2,426,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.