Cose debitrici. Credenze, atmosfere, arte

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
What happens when painting emancipates itself from all physical mediums, the piece of art disappears from the exposition site and it becomes immaterial, indiscernible within its surrounding space? What type of esthetic experience and embodied understanding of art is possible under these programmed and produced conditions, maybe dissimulated, and finally enunciated and affirmed next to and in place of that which presents itself with the title of art masterpiece? What type of description, definition and interpretation is necessary? What type of phenomenology, pragmatic, rhetoric, and ontology is called upon? What type of percepts, of effects and affects, of appearance and apparatus, are put into play in this esthetic relation lacking an artistic object? When there is nothing to see and to touch, what living forms, what beliefs, what qualities are dealt with? Until this day, after more than 50 years, the “Exposition of Void” of Yves Klein doesn’t quit asking these and other questions on aesthetics and to the history of art.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-08-25
Latest version: 2 (2022-03-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
284 ( #26,336 of 69,189 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #56,100 of 69,189 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.