The purpose of this paper is to propose and defend an absolute principle
of truthmaking, a maximalist one according to which every truth is made
true by something in the world beyond itself. I maintain that an absolute
principle must be true, that any weakened version is straightforwardly
contradictory or incoherent. I criticize one principle of truthmaking (in
terms of bald necessity) and articulate one in terms of the relation in virtue of. I then criticize other principles of truthmaking in light of the latter, for I contend that in virtue of has a role in the theory of truthmaking that is essential and ineluctable. That all true representations have a truthmaker as defined by the principle I articulate is the absolute principle of truthmaking I defend. The crux of the paper is the arguments I present in defense of this absolute principle. In defending it against familiar objections to maximalism, an account of the truthmakers that seem to ground all true representations emerges. I maintain that such truthmakers are simple facts. With the absolute principle and its corollary account of truthmakers, this paper contains the core of a comprehensive theory of truthmaking.