Davidson on the Impossibility of Thought without Language. Comments on Diana I. Pérez

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Diana Pérez (2005) criticizes Davidson’s argument for the thesis that there is no thought without language, and offers an alternative defense of that thesis on the basis of empirical studies on developmental psychology. In this comment I argue that more recent studies do not seem to affect Davidson’s argument in the way Pérez suggests, and that her alternative defense of the thesis that there is no thought without language is insufficient. At the end, I offer a sketch of how a weaker and more tenable version of the argument could be articulated.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-10-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
302 ( #19,330 of 2,427,621 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #37,524 of 2,427,621 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.