Neuroscience and the possibility of locally determined choices: Reply to Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias

Philosophical Psychology 30 (1-2):198-201 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a previous paper, I argued that neuroscience and psychology could in principle undermine libertarian free will by providing support for a subset of what I called “statements of local determination.” I also argued that Libet-style experiments have not so far supported statements of that sort. In a commentary to the paper, Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias accept the claim about Libet-style experiments, but reject the claim about the possibilities of neuroscience. Here, I explain why I still disagree with their conclusion, despite being sympathetic to a lot of what they say in support of it.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FISNAT-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Human Freedom and the Self.Chisholm, Roderick M.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-17

Total views
102 ( #33,015 of 50,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #22,587 of 50,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.