Neuroscience and the possibility of locally determined choices: Reply to Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias

Philosophical Psychology 30 (1-2):198-201 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a previous paper, I argued that neuroscience and psychology could in principle undermine libertarian free will by providing support for a subset of what I called “statements of local determination.” I also argued that Libet-style experiments have not so far supported statements of that sort. In a commentary to the paper, Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias accept the claim about Libet-style experiments, but reject the claim about the possibilities of neuroscience. Here, I explain why I still disagree with their conclusion, despite being sympathetic to a lot of what they say in support of it.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FISNAT-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-12-17

Total views
126 ( #33,864 of 55,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,739 of 55,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.