Neuroscience and the possibility of locally determined choices: Reply to Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias

Philosophical Psychology 30 (1-2):198-201 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a previous paper, I argued that neuroscience and psychology could in principle undermine libertarian free will by providing support for a subset of what I called “statements of local determination.” I also argued that Libet-style experiments have not so far supported statements of that sort. In a commentary to the paper, Adina Roskies and Eddy Nahmias accept the claim about Libet-style experiments, but reject the claim about the possibilities of neuroscience. Here, I explain why I still disagree with their conclusion, despite being sympathetic to a lot of what they say in support of it.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FISNAT-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Human Freedom and the Self.Chisholm, Roderick

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-17

Total downloads
30 ( #30,636 of 35,956 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #18,227 of 35,956 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.