Priority monism, partiality, and minimal truthmakers

Philosophical Studies 172 (2):477-491 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Truthmaker monism is the view that the one and only truthmaker is the world. Despite its unpopularity, this view has recently received an admirable defence by Schaffer :307–324, 2010b). Its main defect, I argue, is that it omits partial truthmakers. If we omit partial truthmakers, we lose the intimate connection between a truth and its truthmaker. I further argue that the notion of a minimal truthmaker should be the key notion that plays the role of constraining ontology and that truthmaker monism is not necessary for an appropriate solution to the problem of finding truthmakers for negative truths. I conclude that we should reject truthmaker monism once and for all.

Author's Profile

A. R. J. Fisher
Gonzaga University

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-27

Downloads
484 (#29,243)

6 months
79 (#46,965)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?