Rejecting Well-Being Invariabilism

Philosophical Papers 38 (1):21-34 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper is an attempt to undermine a basic assumption of theories of well-being, one that I call well-being invariabilism. I argue that much of what makes existing theories of well-being inadequate stems from the invariabilist assumption. After distinguishing and explaining well-being invariabilism and well-being variabilism, I show that the most widely-held theories of well-being—hedonism, desire-satisfaction, and pluralist objective-list theories—presuppose invariabilism and that a large class of the objections to them arise because of it. My aim is to show that abandoning invariabilism and adopting variabilism is a sensible first step for those aiming to formulate more plausible theories of well-being. After considering objections to my argument, I explain what a variabilist theory of well-being would be like and show that well-being variabilism need not be any threat to the project of formulating theories of well-being that deliver general principles concerning well-being enhancement.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Principia Ethica.Moore, G. E.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Hybrid Theories.Woodard, Christopher

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
343 ( #8,212 of 39,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #11,255 of 39,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.