Constructive Thoughts on Pierre Menard

Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):338-347 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Interpretational monists and pluralists most often accept contextualism. At the same time, most of them resist constructivism, which takes all interpretations of artworks to be separate artworks. However, one of the central arguments to establish contextualism, based on Borges’ story of Pierre Menard, is so formulated that using it can force all contextualists into accepting constructivism. This paper points out the under-specification present in the philosophical use of the Pierre Menard example to then combine it with arguments presented by contextualists themselves and show that without a more careful look at the example discussed, accepting all those arguments entails constructivism.

Author's Profile

Simon Fokt
HTW Berlin

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-03

Downloads
487 (#32,818)

6 months
94 (#41,398)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?