Indexing Philosophy in a Fair and Inclusive Key

Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-22 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Existing indexing systems used to arrange philosophical works have been shown to misrepresent the discipline in ways that reflect and perpetuate exclusionary attitudes within it. In recent years, there has been a great deal of effort to challenge those attitudes and to revise them. But as the discipline moves toward greater equality and inclusivity, the way it has indexed its work has unfortunately not. To course correct, we identify in this article some of the specific changes that are needed within current indexing systems and propose a new model that could embody them. We use the Diversity Reading List in Philosophy as a case study and PhilPapers as a basis for comparison. The model we propose not only represents the discipline in a more inclusive and fair way, but it is also efficient, easy to use or implement, and adaptable for a variety of contexts.

Author Profiles

Clotilde Torregrossa
University of St. Andrews
Simon Fokt
HTW Berlin

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-14

Downloads
170 (#73,381)

6 months
99 (#38,431)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?