The Argument from Back-Street Abortion Revisited

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Motivated by recent political trends surrounding the legality of abortion, and noting the apparent difficulty with which partisan agreement can be found when engaging with arguments from foetal personhood, this paper revisits a classic axiological argument for the legalisation of abortion which relies on a commitment to the moral relevancy of consequences and the empirically sound nature of said consequences. Academically known as the Argument from Back-Street Abortion, agreement with the argument's premises entails the legalisation of abortion is morally obligatory, and agreement to said argument's premises are possible regardless of one's position regarding a foetus' right-to-life. As such, this oft-overlooked argument deserves revisiting due to its potential for bipartisan reconciliation in service of the establishment of ethical abortion policy.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FORTAF-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-07-12

Total views
80 ( #40,281 of 54,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #31,865 of 54,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.