Arguments Whose Strength Depends on Continuous Variation

Informal Logic 33 (1):33-56 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Both the traditional Aristotelian and modern symbolic approaches to logic have seen logic in terms of discrete symbol processing. Yet there are several kinds of argument whose validity depends on some topological notion of continuous variation, which is not well captured by discrete symbols. Examples include extrapolation and slippery slope arguments, sorites, fuzzy logic, and those involving closeness of possible worlds. It is argued that the natural first attempts to analyze these notions and explain their relation to reasoning fail, so that ignorance of their nature is profound.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-03
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
228 ( #27,281 of 2,448,710 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,082 of 2,448,710 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.