Original Sin and a Broad Free Will Defense

Philosophia Christi 14 (2):353–371 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I begin with a distinction between narrow and broad defenses to the logical problem of evil. The former is simply an attempt to show that God and evil are not logically incompat-ible whereas the latter attempts the same, but only by appealing to beliefs one takes to be true in the actual world. I then argue that while recent accounts of original sin may be consistent with a broad defense, they are also logically incoherent. After considering potential replies, I conclude by proposing an account of original sin that is both logically coherent and consistent with a broad defense.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-06-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
700 ( #7,633 of 2,444,737 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #11,406 of 2,444,737 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.