Surviving death: how to refute termination theses

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
When deciding how ‘death’ should be defined, it is helpful to consider cases in which vital functions are restored to an organism long after those vital functions have ceased. Here I consider whether such restoration cases can be used to refute termination theses. Focusing largely on the termination thesis applied to human animals, I develop a line of argument from the possibility of human restoration to the conclusion that in many actual cases, human animals continue to exist after they die. The line of reasoning developed here can be extended to show that other organisms survive death in many actual cases. This line of reasoning improves on other arguments that have been offered against termination theses. And if my argument regarding human animals surviving death is successful, then assuming that human persons are animals, we can also conclude that human persons in many actual cases continue to exist after death.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017, 2018
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRASDH
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-06-22
Latest version: 2 (2018-03-14)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-05-04

Total views
220 ( #20,286 of 51,422 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #13,830 of 51,422 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.