The Argument from Pain: A New Argument for Indirect Realism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The author puts forward and defends a new argument for indirect realism called the argument from pain. The argument is akin to a well-known traditional argument to the same end, the argument from hallucination. Like the latter, it contains one premise stating an analogy between veridical perceptions and certain other states and one premise stating that those states are states of acquaintance with sense-data. The crucial difference is that the states that are said to be analogous to veridical perceptions are pain-states instead of hallucinations. This difference makes the argument from pain immune to the standard objections against the argument from hallucination.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-10-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
594 ( #10,206 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #8,206 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.