Fictional characters

Philosophy Compass 2 (2):141–156 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
If there are no fictional characters, how do we explain thought and discourse apparently about them? If there are, what are they like? A growing number of philosophers claim that fictional characters are abstract objects akin to novels or plots. They argue that postulating characters provides the most straightforward explanation of our literary practices as well as a uniform account of discourse and thought about fiction. Anti-realists counter that postulation is neither necessary nor straightforward, and that the invocation of pretense provides a better account of the same phenomena. I outline and assess these competing theories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-12-20
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
2,269 ( #1,422 of 2,449,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
106 ( #5,299 of 2,449,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.