Preservationism in the Epistemology of Memory

Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268) (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Preservationism states that memory preserves the justification of the beliefs it preserves. More precisely: if S formed a justified belief that p at t1 and retains in memory a belief that p until t2, then S's belief that p is prima facie justified via memory at t2. Preservationism is an unchallenged orthodoxy in the epistemology of memory. Advocates include Sven Bernecker, Tyler Burge, Alvin Goldman, Gilbert Harman, Michael Huemer, Matthew McGrath, and Thomas Senor. I develop three dilemmas for it, in part by drawing on research in cognitive psychology. The dilemmas centre on preservationism's implications for certain cases involving either stored beliefs, forgotten evidence, or recollection failure. Each dilemma shows that preservationism either is false or lacks key support.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Change in View.Harman, Gilbert
Evidentialism.Feldman, Richard & Conee, Earl
Generative Memory.Michaelian, Kourken

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Forgetting.Frise, Matthew

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
310 ( #14,081 of 48,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #8,924 of 48,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.