The great beetle debate: A study in imagining with names

Philosophical Studies 153 (2):183-211 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Statements about fictional characters, such as “Gregor Samsa has been changed into a beetle,” pose the problem of how we can say something true (or false) using empty names. I propose an original solution to this problem that construes such utterances as reports of the “prescriptions to imagine” generated by works of fiction. In particular, I argue that we should construe these utterances as specifying, not what we are supposed to imagine—the propositional object of the imagining—but how we are supposed to imagine. Most other theories of thought and discourse about fictional characters either fail to capture the intentionality of our imaginings, or else obscure the differences between imaginings directed toward fictional characters and those directed toward real individuals. I argue that once we have an account of prescriptions to imagine about real individuals, we can adapt the same framework to specify the contents of prescriptions to imagine about fictional characters, and thereby to account for the truth (or falsity) of statements about fictional characters.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRITGB
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Themes From Kaplan.Almog, Joseph; Perry, John & Wettstein, Howard (eds.)

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Co‐Identification and Fictional Names.García‐Carpintero, Manuel

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-12-09

Total views
456 ( #5,895 of 40,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #18,542 of 40,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.