Anticipation and the Constitution of Time in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I will argue with Ernst Cassirer that anticipation plays an essential part in the constitution of time, as seen from a transcendental perspective. Time is, as any transcendental concept, regarded as basically relational and subjective and only in a derivative way objective and indifferent to us. This entails that memory is prior to history, and that anticipation is prior to prediction. In this paper, I will give some examples in order to argue for this point. Furthermore, I will also argue, again with Cassirer and contra Henri Bergson, that time should be seen as a functional unity, and not as a collection of three different things-in-themselves (past, present and future).
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-08-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
483 ( #8,510 of 50,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #16,585 of 50,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.