Anticipation and the Constitution of Time in the Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I will argue with Ernst Cassirer that anticipation plays an essential part in the constitution of time, as seen from a transcendental perspective. Time is, as any transcendental concept, regarded as basically relational and subjective and only in a derivative way objective and indifferent to us. This entails that memory is prior to history, and that anticipation is prior to prediction. In this paper, I will give some examples in order to argue for this point. Furthermore, I will also argue, again with Cassirer and contra Henri Bergson, that time should be seen as a functional unity, and not as a collection of three different things-in-themselves (past, present and future).
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-08-16
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
618 ( #10,113 of 65,602 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #20,393 of 65,602 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.