PC: Response to Critics

In John M. DePoe & Tyler Dalton McNabb (eds.), Debating Christian Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 98-106 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, Gage and McAllister respond to various objections to the phenomenal conservative position in religious epistemology. In particular, they respond to the objections that seemings are the ultimate source of justification, that PC makes epistemic justification too easy, that PC involves conceptual circularity, and that PC lacks an objective connection to truth.

Author Profiles

Logan Paul Gage
Franciscan University of Steubenville
Blake McAllister
Hillsdale College

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-02

Downloads
253 (#79,381)

6 months
53 (#89,301)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?