Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):523-534 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the opening section of this paper we spell out an account of our na ve view of bodily sensations that is of historical and philosophical significance. This account of our shared view of bodily sensations captures common ground between Descartes, who endorses an error theory regarding our everyday thinking about bodily sensations, and Berkeley, who is more sympathetic with common sense. In the second part of the paper we develop an alternative to this account and discuss what is at stake in deciding between these two ways of understanding our everyday view. In the third and final part of the paper we offer an argument in favour of our alternative
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GANETA
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-06-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Consciousness and the World.O'Shaughnessy, Brian (ed.)
Colours: Their Nature and Representation.Maund, Barry & Westphal, Jonathan

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total views
638 ( #5,826 of 50,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #26,282 of 50,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.