Why the new theorist may still need to explain cognitive significance but not mind doing it

Philosophia 28 (1-4):455-465 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In "Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?", Howard Wettstein denies that semantics must account for cognitive significance. He thus rejects Frege's condition of adequacy for semantics and rids the new theorists from seemingly intractable puzzles. In a more recent article, Wettstein claims that not only reference but even cognitive significance is not a matter of how the referent is presented to the mind of the speaker. In this paper, I submit that the crucial element in the debate between new theorists and neo-Fregeans concerning the semantic significance of language is the connection between semantic matters and the human thougth.
Reprint years
2006
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GARWTN
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
135 ( #30,135 of 53,019 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #31,286 of 53,019 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.