Two Ways of Being for an End

Phronesis 63 (1):64-86 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
_ Source: _Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 64 - 86 Five times in the extant corpus, Aristotle refers to a distinction between two ways of being a ‘that for the sake of which’ that he sometimes marks by using genitive and dative pronouns. Commentators almost universally say that this is the distinction between an aim and beneficiary. I propose that Aristotle had a quite different distinction in mind, namely: that which holds between something and the aim or objective it is in the business of producing or achieving, and that which holds between some instrument and the user of that instrument.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-03-16
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
107 ( #38,947 of 58,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #46,756 of 58,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.