Knowledge in action

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper argues that the role of knowledge in the explanation and production of intentional action is as indispensable as the roles of belief and desire. If we are interested in explaining intentional actions rather than intentions or attempts, we need to make reference to more than the agent’s beliefs and desires. It is easy to see how the truth of your beliefs, or perhaps, facts about a setting will be involved in the explanation of an action. If you believe you can stop your car by pressing a pedal, then, if your belief is true, you will stop. If it is false, you will not. By considering cases of unintentional actions, actions involving luck and cases of deviant causal chains, I show why knowledge is required. By looking at the notion of causal relevance, I argue that the connection between knowledge and action is causal and not merely conceptual
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Very Improbable Knowing.Williamson, Timothy

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
178 ( #14,821 of 38,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #21,540 of 38,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.